How AI Changed Content Writing and What It Means If You Are Hiring a Writer
- Heather Burdo
- Mar 19
- 5 min read

You pulled up a chatbot, typed in a topic, and had a 1,000 word draft in about forty seconds. It was coherent. It was structured. It covered the basics. And somewhere around the third paragraph you realized it sounded exactly like every other piece of content on that topic, written by no one in particular, for no one in particular.
That is where a lot of businesses are right now. Not wondering whether AI can write. It clearly can. Wondering whether what it produces is doing anything useful for their business.
The answer depends on what you need content to do.
What AI Changed and What It Did Not
The volume game for generic content is over. Basic blog posts, product descriptions, and boilerplate how-to guides are all handled faster and cheaper by AI than any human writer will match. That shift is real and it is not reversing.
What changed alongside it is the standard. Generic content used to cost money. Now it costs nothing. So the question a buyer reading your blog is unconsciously asking has shifted from "did they bother publishing something" to "does this person know something I do not." When the bar for publishing dropped to zero, the bar for being worth reading went up.
That is the part most companies missed when they moved their content budgets toward AI tools. They solved the volume problem and created a differentiation problem.
What AI Content Costs You
The expense of cheap content is rarely the content itself. It is everything downstream.
When a manufacturing CEO lands on a blog post that sounds like it was written by someone who has never been inside a manufacturing facility, they leave. Not because the writing was technically wrong, but because it felt generic and they noticed. Trust does not transfer from a piece of content that does not demonstrate any real understanding of the reader's situation.
Research from Bain found that nearly 60 percent of Google searches in the US now end without a click. Someone types a question, gets an AI-generated summary at the top of the page, and never visits any website at all. The content that still earns a visit is the content that demonstrates something the summary cannot replicate, which is genuine expertise, a specific point of view, or direct experience with the problem the reader is trying to solve. Generic AI content does not clear that bar. It feeds the summary and disappears.
Google's position on this has been consistent: helpful, people-first content earns rankings. Content that exists to fill a publishing schedule does not, regardless of how it was produced.
Google ran three major core updates in 2025, in March, June, and December, each one tightening how it evaluates content quality. The August 2025 spam update specifically targeted low-value AI-generated content. The pattern across all four updates was consistent: content that demonstrated genuine expertise and original thinking held its rankings. Content that existed primarily to fill a page did not. Google did not penalize sites for using AI. It penalized them for having nothing worth reading.
What a Human Writer Brings That AI Does Not
This is not an argument against using tools. Every competent writer uses them. The argument is about what tools cannot replace.
Point of View: AI synthesizes what already exists online. By design, it is a sophisticated average of everything published on a topic. A writer with real industry experience brings something the internet does not already contain, shaped by exposure to real buyers, real objections, and real outcomes. That is what makes a piece worth sharing rather than skimming.
Audience Precision: Knowing your buyer is a B2B CEO is different from knowing what that CEO worries about at 2am. That specificity separates content that converts from content that just ranks. AI can target a keyword. It cannot replicate the instinct of a writer who understands where a specific buyer's skepticism lives.
Strategic Alignment: A writer who understands your sales cycle and the objections buyers raise before they sign writes differently than one handed a keyword and a word count. That difference shows up in whether the content supports the business or just populates the site.
Business Insider reported in late 2025 that companies including Netflix, Microsoft, and Anthropic were offering six-figure salaries for roles centered on human communication and storytelling. The demand for people who can make complex ideas land with a real audience did not go away when AI got better at generating sentences. It went up.
What to Look for When Hiring a Writer Now
The AI shift has made this evaluation both easier and harder. Easier because the writers still getting consistent work have separated themselves clearly from the ones who were just producing volume. Harder because AI-generated samples can look polished on the surface.
A few things worth asking before hiring:
Can the writer explain how they would approach your specific audience rather than the general topic? A writer who asks about your buyer before talking about keywords is thinking about the right thing first.
Do they have experience in your industry or one close to it? Not because a good writer cannot learn a new vertical, but because subject matter familiarity shows up in the details and the details are what make content credible.
Can they show you a piece that did something for a business? Ranking is fine. Generating a qualified inquiry is better. Understanding what the content was supposed to accomplish and whether it did says more about a writer's strategic thinking than the writing itself.
What is their honest relationship with AI tools? A writer who claims to never use any tools at all is probably not being straight with you. A writer who uses AI to replace their judgment rather than support their research is a liability. The writers worth hiring use tools the way a skilled editor uses spellcheck, as part of a process, not as a substitute for one.
Where This Leaves You
The market corrected faster than most people expected. Companies that flooded their sites with AI-generated posts found out quickly that more content is not the same as better content. The writers still in consistent demand are not the ones who produce the most words. They are the ones who understand a business well enough to write something the buyer needed to read.
That kind of writing was valuable before AI arrived. It is considerably more valuable now that everything else got cheaper.
Your Competitors Are Publishing AI Content. That's Your Opportunity.
When everything online starts sounding the same, the writer who sounds different wins. If you are looking for content that reflects how your business thinks, not just what your industry says, that is exactly what good writing does.
Send a quick email to heather@heatherburdo.com and let's figure out what your content should be doing that it currently is not.


Comments